Fixed bug accessing ListField (BaseList) with negative indices
If you __setitem__ in BaseList with a negative index and then try to save this, you will get an error like: OperationError: Could not save document (cannot use the part (shape of signal.shape.-1) to traverse the element ({shape: [ 0 ]})). To fix this I rectify negative list indices in BaseList _mark_as_changed as the appropriate positive index. This fixes the above error.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b1509f307
commit
00430491ca
1
AUTHORS
1
AUTHORS
@ -236,3 +236,4 @@ that much better:
|
||||
* Luo Peng (https://github.com/RussellLuo)
|
||||
* Bryan Bennett (https://github.com/bbenne10)
|
||||
* Gilb's Gilb's (https://github.com/gilbsgilbs)
|
||||
* Joshua Nedrud (https://github.com/Neurostack)
|
||||
|
@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Changes in 0.10.7 - DEV
|
||||
- count on ListField of EmbeddedDocumentField fails. #1187
|
||||
- Fixed long fields stored as int32 in Python 3. #1253
|
||||
- MapField now handles unicodes keys correctly. #1267
|
||||
- ListField now handles negative indicies correctly. #1270
|
||||
|
||||
Changes in 0.10.6
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
@ -199,7 +199,8 @@ class BaseList(list):
|
||||
def _mark_as_changed(self, key=None):
|
||||
if hasattr(self._instance, '_mark_as_changed'):
|
||||
if key:
|
||||
self._instance._mark_as_changed('%s.%s' % (self._name, key))
|
||||
self._instance._mark_as_changed('%s.%s' % (self._name,
|
||||
key % len(self)))
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self._instance._mark_as_changed(self._name)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1160,6 +1160,19 @@ class FieldTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
simple = simple.reload()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(simple.widgets, [4])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_list_field_with_negative_indices(self):
|
||||
|
||||
class Simple(Document):
|
||||
widgets = ListField()
|
||||
|
||||
simple = Simple(widgets=[1, 2, 3, 4]).save()
|
||||
simple.widgets[-1] = 5
|
||||
self.assertEqual(['widgets.3'], simple._changed_fields)
|
||||
simple.save()
|
||||
|
||||
simple = simple.reload()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(simple.widgets, [1, 2, 3, 5])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_list_field_complex(self):
|
||||
"""Ensure that the list fields can handle the complex types."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user