Fix the documentation for reverse_delete_rule.

This commit is contained in:
David Czarnecki 2014-10-31 11:40:20 -04:00
parent 158e2a4ca9
commit 4b498ae8cd
3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ cleaner looking while still allowing manual execution of the callback::
ReferenceFields and Signals
---------------------------
Currently `reverse_delete_rules` do not trigger signals on the other part of
Currently `reverse_delete_rule` does not trigger signals on the other part of
the relationship. If this is required you must manually handle the
reverse deletion.

View File

@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ class ReferenceField(BaseField):
Use the `reverse_delete_rule` to handle what should happen if the document
the field is referencing is deleted. EmbeddedDocuments, DictFields and
MapFields do not support reverse_delete_rules and an `InvalidDocumentError`
MapFields does not support reverse_delete_rule and an `InvalidDocumentError`
will be raised if trying to set on one of these Document / Field types.
The options are:
@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ class ReferenceField(BaseField):
Bar.register_delete_rule(Foo, 'bar', NULLIFY)
.. note ::
`reverse_delete_rules` do not trigger pre / post delete signals to be
`reverse_delete_rule` does not trigger pre / post delete signals to be
triggered.
.. versionchanged:: 0.5 added `reverse_delete_rule`

View File

@ -1795,7 +1795,7 @@ class InstanceTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(Bar.objects.count(), 1) # No effect on the BlogPost
self.assertEqual(Bar.objects.get().foo, None)
def test_invalid_reverse_delete_rules_raise_errors(self):
def test_invalid_reverse_delete_rule_raise_errors(self):
def throw_invalid_document_error():
class Blog(Document):