Fix the documentation for reverse_delete_rule.
This commit is contained in:
		| @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ cleaner looking while still allowing manual execution of the callback:: | |||||||
| ReferenceFields and Signals | ReferenceFields and Signals | ||||||
| --------------------------- | --------------------------- | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| Currently `reverse_delete_rules` do not trigger signals on the other part of | Currently `reverse_delete_rule` does not trigger signals on the other part of | ||||||
| the relationship.  If this is required you must manually handle the | the relationship.  If this is required you must manually handle the | ||||||
| reverse deletion. | reverse deletion. | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|   | |||||||
| @@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ class ReferenceField(BaseField): | |||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|     Use the `reverse_delete_rule` to handle what should happen if the document |     Use the `reverse_delete_rule` to handle what should happen if the document | ||||||
|     the field is referencing is deleted.  EmbeddedDocuments, DictFields and |     the field is referencing is deleted.  EmbeddedDocuments, DictFields and | ||||||
|     MapFields do not support reverse_delete_rules and an `InvalidDocumentError` |     MapFields does not support reverse_delete_rule and an `InvalidDocumentError` | ||||||
|     will be raised if trying to set on one of these Document / Field types. |     will be raised if trying to set on one of these Document / Field types. | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|     The options are: |     The options are: | ||||||
| @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ class ReferenceField(BaseField): | |||||||
|         Bar.register_delete_rule(Foo, 'bar', NULLIFY) |         Bar.register_delete_rule(Foo, 'bar', NULLIFY) | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|     .. note :: |     .. note :: | ||||||
|         `reverse_delete_rules` do not trigger pre / post delete signals to be |         `reverse_delete_rule` does not trigger pre / post delete signals to be | ||||||
|         triggered. |         triggered. | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|     .. versionchanged:: 0.5 added `reverse_delete_rule` |     .. versionchanged:: 0.5 added `reverse_delete_rule` | ||||||
|   | |||||||
| @@ -1795,7 +1795,7 @@ class InstanceTest(unittest.TestCase): | |||||||
|         self.assertEqual(Bar.objects.count(), 1)  # No effect on the BlogPost |         self.assertEqual(Bar.objects.count(), 1)  # No effect on the BlogPost | ||||||
|         self.assertEqual(Bar.objects.get().foo, None) |         self.assertEqual(Bar.objects.get().foo, None) | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|     def test_invalid_reverse_delete_rules_raise_errors(self): |     def test_invalid_reverse_delete_rule_raise_errors(self): | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|         def throw_invalid_document_error(): |         def throw_invalid_document_error(): | ||||||
|             class Blog(Document): |             class Blog(Document): | ||||||
|   | |||||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user